School returns

Our children return to school next week. In some cases, they will be attending school for the first time. Whether as “veterans” or as first-timers, along with their lunches, most will bring with them pockets full of excitement, worries, wonders and nerves. Parents and grandparents might feel the same way.

The start of the school year is an appropriate occasion to thank our students, their teachers, and the staff of all the schools for being involved in the collective enterprise we call Jewish Day School education. Together, they demonstrably reaffirm their commitment to a Jewish future even as they extend a gesture of gratitude and respect to generations past. 

Daniel Held, the chief program officer of UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, has often spoken about the importance of Jewish day school education. “It looks toward the future and says, ‘How can we have the strongest, most vibrant, most vital Jewish community?’ And decades, if not centuries, of research and experience shows that by educating our kids today, we strengthen the community of the future, we create both a knowledgeable and passionate community and we also create empowered leaders.”

Of course, a day school education is not the only way to instill in our children a commitment to the Jewish future. But study after study show it offers the best chance for doing so. Jewish Day School education provides the richest immersive experience in Jewish knowledge and folkways within a social environment that is supportive and caring. It thus can also become a powerful foreshadowing for our children of mutually sustaining community life in the years to come, instilling in them expansive, positive, personal feelings of belonging to the Jewish people.

To all of our children we say: Good luck next week. May it be the beginning of a wonderful year for you and your friends. And we also say, again: Thank you.

•••

If you wish to contribute to GAJE’s lawsuit for fairness in educational funding, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

September 2, 2022

Advertisement
Posted in Uncategorized

The evidence suggests more choice is the better policy

In last week’s update we stated that we believe the Minister of Education bases its discriminatory educational funding policy on “outdated, incorrect information and upon now-dispelled myths about public funding for independent schools.”

Prof. Vincent Geloso, assistant professor of economics at George Mason University and senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute, indirectly confirmed parts of our assessment in an opinion piece published this week by The Financial Post.  Entitled, Canada needs school choice,

Prof. Geloso criticizes the tired, reflexive responses by politicians whenever they attempt to respond to the latest crisis in student performance and school management.

“New crises prompt political actors to request further rounds of new investments, reinvestments, refinancing, improved financing — the slogans change but the strategy is always to try to secure improvements in educational outcomes by increasing the quantity of inputs used,” Prof. Geloso wrote. He is clearly not impressed by the policy predictability usually dictated by political expedience.

Geloso pleads with Ministry of Education policy makers to abandon the routine responses in favour of the effective ones.

“The literature clearly shows that systems that decentralize management to the local level, introduce choice and exit options for parents and create local feedback mechanisms (such as participating in school associations) heighten the efficiency of any given spending level. In such systems, the state generally disengages from producing the service and concentrates solely on financing it — in ways tied to parental choices.”

“This makes sense for a variety of reasons. First, as a rule, “one-size-fits-all” policies tend to yield disappointing outcomes for heterogenous populations. Second, parental involvement tends to be higher in decentralized systems, and this creates a positive feedback loop between school administrators and local populations. Third, tying funding to parental choices gives parents an exit option, which in turn generates strong incentives for schools to provide higher-quality customization.”

He concludes unequivocally that meaningful increases in parental choice and school autonomy tend to yield positive performance outcomes. The bulk of the empirical literature in the economics of education suggests that policies that improve parental choice and school autonomy provide better ways to spend. The only question is how to adapt school choice and autonomy to each Canadian province’s circumstances for the benefit of parents and students across the country.”

Prof. Geloso strongly implies that bringing fairness in educational funding in Ontario, will also improve the overall quality of the educational system in Ontario. If only the Minister of Education would ask his advisors to provide him with the empirical literature to which Geloso refers.

Some years ago, Charles Pascal, the former education advisor to then-premier Dalton McGuinty described the current educational system in Ontario as anachronistic. Geloso would clearly agree with him. But Geloso would go one meaningful step further: He offers remedial steps to make it up-to-date and far better. More choice for parents is clearly the better educational policy.

The Geloso article is available at:

https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-canada-needs-school-choice

•••

If you wish to contribute to GAJE’s lawsuit for fairness in educational funding, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

August 26, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

The truths about independent schools the government seems not to know

As readers of the GAJE weekly update know, the Government of Ontario steadfastly resists making its educational funding policies apply equally, without discrimination or preference, to all Ontario’s children, including those who learn in independent schools.

Indeed, the government brought a motion last week to strike out GAJE’s lawsuit that seeks to end this discrimination even before the courts have had an opportunity to consider our arguments. The court adjourned the motion until April next year to allow the Ontario Federation of Independent Schools to seek leave of the court to join the lawsuit in support of the same funding fairness and justice that GAJE seeks.

Part of this obstinate refusal, we believe, is based upon the fact that the Minister of Education bases its policy on outdated, incorrect information and upon now-dispelled myths about public funding for independent schools.

David Hunt, the Program Director for Cardus Education, published a brief article last month in The Hub.ca that could be a stepping stone for the Minister of Education, toward the embrace of updated, correct information on the subject.

The article was entitled Religious Independent Schools Are a Win-Win for Students and Society.

Hunt makes the point that “more educational pluralism, not less” is how societies “educate for the common good” and “meet the concerns of cohesion while honouring our differences.”

Hunt categorically asserts that there is a great deal of research that proves denominational and non-denominational independent schools strengthen social cohesion.

According to Hunt, “a recent survey of the academic literature finds that, after controlling for family background, the evidence overwhelmingly dispels fears of independent schools’ negative effect on civic life. In fact, independent-school attendance actually enhances political knowledge and tolerance, civic engagement, and civic skills. Of the 34 credible studies on independent and state schools’ effects on civic outcomes, there are 86 separate statistically significant findings. Of those, 50 findings reveal a clear independent-school advantage, 33 find neutral effects, and only three show a state-school advantage.”

“In other words, independent schools—most of which are religious—are considerably more likely to enhance the civic capabilities of young people and lead, eventually, to a more civically integrated and politically engaged public.”

The results of these various studies unequivocally refute the myths that public funding for independent schools is a threat to the multicultural framework of our society or to the vibrancy of the public school system. In fact, the opposite is true.

To reinforce the anachronistic nature of Ontario’s system of educational funding, Hunt adds: “By the way, most of the world already understands this. In fact, the norm is for governments to publicly fund independent schools, including religious ones, to varying degrees. Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Singapore, and every province west of Ontario are all examples. Given that religious independent schools contribute to the common good, serve the public interest by strengthening civility and social cohesion, and also greatly improve the reading and math abilities of religious students, why wouldn’t we all be supportive? It is a win-win to let parents use the education dollars allocated for their children in the school where they can best thrive.”

The question Hunt poses – why wouldn’t support allocating public education dollars for independent schools – demands an answer. The most charitable answer is that the government seems not to be aware of the truths regarding independent schools and society. If however, the government is indeed aware of these empirical truths and yet persists in its discrimination, then the only answer that stands in the light is too shameful to consider.

Hunt’s article is available at: https://thehub.ca/2022-07-19/david-hunt-religious-independent-schools-are-a-win-win-for-students-and-society/

•••

We draw readers’ attention to an article co-authored by Sarena Koschitzky of Toronto that appeared last month on the ejewishphilanthropy site. Entitled, Making Big Bets on Jewish Day Schools, Koschitzky and her co-author Ann Pava, of West Hartford, Connecticut, introduce to the philanthropic community an approach to charitable giving called Big Bets Philanthropy.

Koschitzky and Pava explain purpose and nature of Big Bets Philanthropy and then add “Jewish day schools promise and deliver the kind of social change that can and should attract Big Bets philanthropy. Together, day school supporters and community leaders can help articulate opportunities that will bring funders the kind of pride and joy” that is inherent in the Big Bets approach to philanthropy.

Sarena Koschitzky, of course, is well-credentialed to write about the subject. No family has contributed more to the permanence of Jewish education in our community – and in some respects around the Jewish world – than Sarena Koschitzky’s family. Indeed, her late mother, Julie, was the highest exemplar, the avatar so to speak, of a day school supporter and a community leader.

The article can be read at: https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/making-big-bets-for-jewish-day-schools/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Your%20Daily%20Phil%20Monday%20July%2025%202022%20copy%2001&utm_content=Your%20Daily%20Phil%20Monday%20July%2025%202022%20copy%2001+CID_d5a1f3177d439827841b2ea6cec8db5c&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Read%20the%20full%20piece%20here

•••

If you wish to contribute to GAJE’s lawsuit for fairness in educational funding, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

August 19, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

Better able to catch the ear and the conscience of the government?

As we advised readers two weeks ago, the Governments of Ontario and Canada responded to our legal effort to end discrimination in educational funding by bringing a motion to strike down our application even before the courts have had the opportunity to consider it upon its merits.

The governments’ motion to strike was postponed until April 20, 2023 to allow the Ontario Federation of Independent Schools (OFIS) to seek permission from the court for leave to intervene as a “friend of the court” (amicus curiae) in the case that GAJE and other individuals have launched against the governments. OFIS’ request is scheduled to be heard on October 3, 2022. If OFIS is granted permission to “join” the lawsuit, one assumes it will also have the right to oppose the governments’ attempt to strike down our action.

Currently, 1,556 independent schools are registered in Ontario. They are attended by 150,666 students, or 6.9% of all students enrolled in the province.

OFIS was established in 1974. It is the largest independent school association in Ontario with 97 affiliated schools. It is also the most diverse independent school association in the province with membership from faith-based schools, culturally-based schools, alternative educational (pedagogical) schools, special needs and neurodiverse schools, community-based schools, and arts & athletics schools.

Of course, GAJE wishes the adjournment of the motion to strike were for a shorter period of time but we understand that the courts are still dealing with severe administrative backlog wrought by COVID. On the other hand, we effusively welcome the attempt by OFIS to try to make its views also known in court regarding the governments’ discriminatory educational funding policies.

If OFIS is granted standing to participate in the case, the collective voices pleading for a remedy to the injustice of Ontario’s educational funding scheme will be deeper, broader and more representative of the widely multi-cultural swath of parents who send their children to school in this province too.

Perhaps, in that case, the pleas for justice will be better able to catch the ear and the conscience of the government?

•••

If you wish to contribute to GAJE’s lawsuit for fairness in educational funding, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

August 12, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

Independent school children also need to “catch up”

Last week, Ontario’s Ministry of Education announced a post-Covid “Plan to Catch Up” for the upcoming school year.

“Our government is looking ahead as we remain squarely focused on ensuring students receive the best stable learning experience possible, and that starts with them being in class, on time, with all of the experiences students deserve,” said Stephen Lecce, Minister of Education.

According to the ministry’s press release, the plan includes five key components:

  1. Getting kids back in classrooms in September, on time, with a full school experience that includes extra-curriculars like clubs, band, and field trips;
  2. New tutoring supports to fill gaps in learning;
  3. Preparing students for the jobs of tomorrow;
  4. Providing more money to build schools and improve education; and
  5. Helping students with historic funding for mental health supports.

The press release touted the government’s financial investment in the educational system that entailed more than $26.6 billion in funding for the 2022-23 school year, “the highest investment in public education in Ontario’s history.” This amount included “allocating $90 million for mental health initiatives and supports for students.” The press release also listed various showcase spending programs for tutoring, special educational grants, students at risk, and capital grants.

The government also highlighted specifically earmarked Covid-protection initiatives. “Since August 2020, more than $665 million has been allocated to improve ventilation and filtration in schools as part of the province’s efforts to protect against COVID-19.” Unfortunately, the release does not tell the whole story about Covid protection in Ontario schools. It omits mentioning that the federal government gave Queen’s Park $763 million for the express purpose of making schools Covid safe for all Ontario children aged 4-18, even children attending independent schools in the province. Yet, Ontario disbursed not one dime to any of the independent schools in the province.

We are pleased that Ontario is investing richly in its schools. It is important beyond description that the government do so. Ontario is the most populous province in the country and its industrial heartland. Educational investment is vital to the province, the country and to all Canadians. But Ontario’s investment is neither appropriate nor adequate. Indeed, until Ontario includes funding for children in independent schools – as the next five largest provinces do – it never will be. Let no-one believe that the impediment to extending funding to independent schools is financial. Cardus, the independent think-tank, put paid to that notion. In its ground breaking study released last September, Cardus recorded “the hypothetical economic costs of funding Ontario’s independent schools if the province were to fully fund the sector or apply any of the partial-funding models in Canada.”

Cardus concluded that applying three different attendance scenarios to each of the seven provincial funding schemes that exist in Canada, the cost to Ontario would range “between $535.2 million and $1.539 billion in net annual cost to Ontario taxpayers. For context, within the scope of Ontario’s $186 billion annual budget, this is around 1/3 to 4/5 of 1 percent (0.3% to 0.8%) of the budget. In other words, any of these funding options is a relatively minimal cost to substantially benefit the families who need it most.”

In providing this comprehensive potential educational funding picture, Cardus noted  that

“funding (independent schools) is the norm around the world, as well as in Canada. Globally, 73 percent of countries at least partially fund independent schools—only one OECD country does not. In Canada outside Ontario, 75 percent of independent schools and 84 percent of independent-school students are partially publicly funded.

“Ontario’s lack of funding is anomalous in both a global and Canadian context.”

Cardus’s observation regarding Ontario’s educational funding must be emphasized: Ontario is the outlier in Canada and in the Western world.

The impediment to Ontario extending funding to independent schools is political. And it is entirely inexplicable since it is based on old, tired, incorrect and anachronistic information.

Despite the soaring rhetoric and the flowing self-congratulations in last week’s press release, Ontario’s educational system fails to match the overall excellence of the five next largest provinces. It fails the tax-paying independent school families whose children also need to “catch up” from the lapses of the past Covid years. And perhaps worst of all, by the government’s refusal to erase the line of discrimination that cuts through and across the educational system in the province, it fails to give true meaning to the values of fairness and justice embedded in Ontario’s very democratic ethos.

•••

As readers know, GAJE has launched an application in court to eliminate Ontario’s discrimination in educational funding. If you wish to contribute to the lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)August 5, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

Disappointment deepens as society is diminished

This week we update our supporters and readers of this space on the status of our action against the governments of Ontario and Canada aimed at persuading Ontario’s to end its unfair educational funding policies.

On February 8, 2022 GAJE and a number of individuals applied to the Ontario Superior Court for an order directing the governments of Ontario and Canada to provide payments to each of the Jewish day schools in Ontario based on a per capita grant calculated from the student population of those schools equal to the per capita grant for Roman Catholic day schools.

The attorneys-general of Ontario and Canada responded to GAJE’s application on March 28 by filing a motion that the court strike our application as disclosing no cause of action.

It is the view of the Federal Government that it has no legal or constitutional role to play in an educational dispute between the applicants and the Government of Ontario. It is the view of Queen’s Park that the 1996 Supreme Court Adler decision allows Ontario to refuse to fund independent schools.

It is our view that the Federal Government does indeed have a role to play in ensuring the true application of human rights obligations across Canada under ratified international treaty law. It is also our point of view that Ontario ought to acknowledge that Canadian society and Canadian law have evolved since the Adler case of 1996 to such an extent that a different decision on funding Jewish day schools is not only possible but morally appropriate and even required in the year 2022. Our case has merit. We fervently hope it will be allowed to go forward to a full hearing on those merits. The governments prefer to prevent rather than join discussion in open court on so important an educational and human rights matter. This merely blights Ontario’s reputation in comparison with the reputations of the other Canadian provinces. And of course, it deepens disappointment as it continues to diminish Ontario society.

The governments’ motion to strike is scheduled to be heard on August 9, 2022. In the event the motion succeeds, we have the right to appeal the decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal. We will keep you informed as the case proceeds.

This lawsuit is a vital investment in our children and in our Jewish future. We are deeply grateful for your understanding and for your support.

•••

If you wish to contribute to funding GAJE’s lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

July 29, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

‘The funding of Jewish education is first and foremost’

In the wisdom literature of our people, King Solomon, stands tall for his voluminous, profound contributions to the insights and the values that steer Jewish life. He authored one of life’s simplest, yet most effective lessons: “speak less and do more”. Its various iterations appear in the Books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes and indeed throughout the holy writings of the Bible.

In post-Holocaust Jewish history, Kurt Rothschild stood very tall for uniquely and devotedly taking  that specific instruction by King Solomon deeply to heart for the rebuilding of Jewish life.

Born some 101 years ago in Germany, Kurt became a Canadian after having been interned for two years by the British Government as an “enemy alien.” The horror of the destruction of the majority of European Jewry was the crucible that forever inflamed in him the glowing inner light that piloted his entire life.

Kurt wrote of his formative years: “I was fortunate to escape from the European inferno before the outbreak of war and, although I did not experience the horrendous cruelties of the extermination camps, the fact that I am of the Holocaust generation, has had a tremendous and over-riding effect on my goals and aspirations and is the motivation for my intense involvement in Jewish life in Canada, Israel and world-wide.”

He once told an interviewer that he felt “an obligation to honour the memory of the more than million Jewish children slaughtered by the Nazis.” He fulfilled that obligation by working for the Jewish people. The stream of Jewish communal life into which he poured his considerable strength and inexhaustible goodness was that of Jewish education and social activity.

Kurt served in countless official community capacities. For example, he was president of the world Mizrahi movement, the former president of the Zionist Federation of Canada, as well as an active director on diverse communal, university and hospital boards in North America and Israel. 

Earlier this week, alas, in Jerusalem, Kurt passed away at the age of 101.

Before he made aliyah a decade ago, Kurt was a long-standing member of the editorial advisory board of The Canadian Jewish News. The mission of the paper in the days when it existed as a weekly print edition until June 13, 2013, was “to serve the best interests of the Jewish people wherever they are situated.” No words could more accurately and concisely describe the purpose, mission and very essence of Kurt Rothschild’s life.

At The CJN table, Kurt consistently, eloquently and even lovingly spoke in support of enabling the widest embrace possible of Jewish education – in traditional and more adapted, modern forms – as the strongest way of holding the diverse pieces of our people together forever. He was a perfect advisor to the editor of The CJN – wise, practical and always caring for his co-religionists. Wherever he perceived a need to act, he did so with full capacious heart.

Kurt understood deep in his soul that reaching children was the most cherished treasure and that the best way to ensure the treasure’s permanence was by teaching. “To safeguard and promote Jewish continuity,” he once wrote, “the funding of Jewish education is first and foremost on my list of obligations. Our youth must be taught the ethics of our Torah and our incredible history throughout the ages in order to identify as Jews and carry on our precious traditions.”

Kurt Rothschild’s list of obligations is also ours. His memory will indeed always be for blessing.

•••

GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy the government’s unfair educational funding policy. If you wish to contribute to funding GAJE’s lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

•••

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

July 22, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

Are Ontario’s educational policy makers so unaware?

Last month, Gillian Livingston, business writer and former deputy editor for Globe Investor, published an article in the Globe and Mail entitled, Pandemic learning gaps have parents digging deep to put their kids in private schools. The article was primarily prescriptive, providing suggestions to young parents for finding strategies to manage their limited funds to try to accommodate the expense of independent schools within the already expensive, high cost of life in the GTA.

Livingston began the article by noting the uptick in enrollment in independent schools due to the negative impact of the pandemic on teaching and learning within the public school sector. This  increasing turn to independent schools has resulted in ravages in the monthly budgets and savings of the families who are seeking a more appropriate education for their children.

Of course, young parents in our community are quite familiar with the budgetary ravages and the various strategies that Livingston recommends.

We point to her article however to call attention to the enrollment phenomenon she describes, her actual chronicling of the financial hardship that accompanies such vital educational decisions by parents in determining the best interest long-term interests of their children, and for her corroboration of some of the observations recorded by the public-policy think tank, Cardus, that have also frequently appeared in this space.

“Cardus, a Hamilton-based public-policy think tank, examined private schools in OntarioBritish Columbia and Alberta in a 2019 report to find out who is attending and how parents are paying for it. In Ontario, two-thirds of parents sending their child to private school made “major financial changes to afford the cost” including taking a part-time job or changing jobs, making budget sacrifices, relying on a bursary, taking out a loan or getting help from family, the Cardus survey found.

“In Ontario, private schools do not get public funding while there are varying levels of government financial support for private schools in Alberta and B.C.”

 (We point out that Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Quebec also provide government financial support for private schools.)

That Ontario is the sole provincial government, excluding the underpopulated Atlantic provinces, that refuses to assist independent school parents in choosing the best, most appropriate education for their children and in advancing and improving educational outcomes within the province overall – is perplexing. How is that Ontario’s policy makers are unaware of the well-documented educational, social and even financial benefits to the province in participating in the funding of independent schools.

That Ontario is the sole provincial government, excluding the underpopulated Atlantic provinces, that refuses to assist independent school parents in simply eliminating the injustice and the unfairness that continues to characterize Ontario’s educational funding and no other provinces’ funding is also an affront to conscience. Queen’s Park perpetuates the discrimination and injustice that we had long ago hoped we would never see again. That it exists in the Ontario of 2022 diminishes our society even as it shames the government for allowing it to persist.

Livingston’s article is available at:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/personal-finance/household-finances/article-private-school-enrollment-rising-can-you-afford-it/

•••

GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy the government’s unfair educational funding policy. If you wish to contribute to funding GAJE’s lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

•••

Shabbat shalom

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

July 15, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized

Bring fairness to Ontario’s educational funding would be a fitting tribute to Irving Abella

Such was the significance of his life and so entirely embracing were the affections he engendered that the sad news of Irving Abella’s passing on July 3rd appeared on the front page of The Globe and Mail and was among the lead items on a number of news telecasts and broadcasts.

The very long list of Abella’s accomplishments – or excerpts from that list – were published in the obituaries that noted his passing and attempted to pay him tribute. But even as a few bars of powerfully striking and moving notes cannot convey the full emotional impact of an entire symphony, no obituary of Irving Abella, however comprehensive or tenderly composed, can convey adequate tribute to him.

Nor will this one. Nevertheless, GAJE must acknowledge the debt we owe to Irving Abella.

In his professional life, Irving Abella was a teacher, professor, scholar, writer, historian, advocate, administrator, organizer, community activist and much more. Through it all, the iron-clad tie that bound his work to the essential core of his nature was his deep sense of justice. Irving Abella always fought for the oppressed. His conscience bridled at injustice. Whether writing about labour history in Canada, or about the barring of Canada’s borders to the Jews of Europe attempting to save themselves from the Nazis, he saw his task as bringing the heartless and the unkind, the cruel and the unjust, the powerful and the uncaring to account for their inhumane ways.

As we have noted in this space before, in the Afterward to a volume of essays that resulted from a conference titled Creating the Jewish Future which was held at the Centre for Jewish Studies at York University in 1996,  Abella wrote the following: “It seemed self-evident that the major challenge to our Jewish leadership in the next generation should be building a Jewish community that is not simply concerned with survival, but one that is creative and attractive to our children – a community with substance and content, a community that stresses not only memory but other important values of our traditions – primarily social justice, equity, compassion and spirituality. We pride in its activities and achievements. We will have to find ways to convert alienation to action and passivity to pride, the pride of being possessors of a great legacy, a legacy which has meaning for today and beyond.”

We are the next generation to whom Abella addressed those words of challenge. More than a quarter century later, it still rests on our shoulders. Indeed, as he well knew, and which is why he likely cast it the way he did, the “challenge” falls upon every generation with appropriate adjustments according to the circumstances of the times and place.  

Readers of this weekly report know, GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy Ontario’s unfair, unjust educational funding. Queen’s Park justifies its educational funding policy on the basis of the 1996 decision by the Supreme Court in the Adler case in which the Court ruled Ontario could legally fund the educational system of only one religion to the exclusion of all religions practiced in Ontario. The decision did not prevent Ontario from extending funding to other, independent, denominational schools.

To this very day, some 26 years later, Ontario does not suggest that its policy is fair to non-Catholics. Rather, the government maintains it is immune from being legally compelled to change its policy. 

Between 1992 and 1995, Abella served as the president of the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC).

It was under Abella’s presidency that the Adler case was launched. Indeed it was the CJC that shepherded the case through the courts, providing counsel and resources on behalf of the plaintiffs. The Supreme Court decision was handed down in November of 1996 after being argued in January of that year. But it was an appeal  from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal in 1994 dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Ontario High Court in 1992.

Some years ago, Abella, an alumnus of Associated Hebrew Schools (AHS), lent his name and his photo to a campaign the school had embarked upon to help bust some very harmful myths about graduates of Jewish day schools. We are familiar with these myths: day school graduates tend not to participate in the life of the wider community; they adopt inward-looking ways and look only to a cloistered horizon. But the truth is generally quite the opposite. Abella’s life is the poignant refutation of the lie and/or the ignorance peddled by demagogues that public assistance to independent schools would shred to pieces the fabric of our multicultural society.

As Irving Abella’s life attests, day school graduates – dare we also say – independent school graduates – participate with as much vigour and volunteer energy in the life of the wider community as do public school graduates. They stand for inclusion, tolerance and wide horizons as forcefully as the graduates of public schools, indeed, if not more.

Irving Abella was the perfect representative/embodiment/spokesperson for Canadian Jewry: dignified of bearing; thoughtful, studied, careful, calmly compelling of speech, courageous in action and deeply good of character. Of some it would merely be an eye-rolling cliché to add, but of Abella it was as true as a ray of sharply defined light cutting through the dark, that he walked and talked and comported himself as comfortably and as purposefully with prime ministers and presidents as he did with hourly paid workers, salaried employees, students and editors. He was simply a deeply principled human being. His memory will always be for blessing.

Succeeding in having the courts re-assess the correctness of the Adler decision in the year 2022 and as a resykt, hopefully bring fairness to Ontario’s educational funding would be a fitting tribute to Irving Abella.

•••

Shabbat shalom Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE

Bring fairness to Ontario’s educational funding would be a fitting tribute to Irving Abella

Such was the significance of his life and so entirely embracing were the affections he engendered that the sad news of Irving Abella’s passing on July 3rd appeared on the front page of The Globe and Mail and was among the lead items on a number of news telecasts and broadcasts.

The very long list of Abella’s accomplishments – or excerpts from that list – were published in the obituaries that noted his passing and attempted to pay him tribute. But even as a few bars of powerfully striking and moving notes cannot convey the full emotional impact of an entire symphony, no obituary of Irving Abella, however comprehensive or tenderly composed, can convey adequate tribute to him.

Nor will this one. Nevertheless, GAJE must acknowledge the debt we owe to Irving Abella.

In his professional life, Irving Abella was a teacher, professor, scholar, writer, historian, advocate, administrator, organizer, community activist and much more. Through it all, the iron-clad tie that bound his work to the essential core of his nature was his deep sense of justice. Irving Abella always fought for the oppressed. His conscience bridled at injustice. Whether writing about labour history in Canada, or about the barring of Canada’s borders to the Jews of Europe attempting to save themselves from the Nazis, he saw his task as bringing the heartless and the unkind, the cruel and the unjust, the powerful and the uncaring to account for their inhumane ways.

As we have noted in this space before, in the Afterward to a volume of essays that resulted from a conference titled Creating the Jewish Future which was held at the Centre for Jewish Studies at York University in 1996,  Abella wrote the following: “It seemed self-evident that the major challenge to our Jewish leadership in the next generation should be building a Jewish community that is not simply concerned with survival, but one that is creative and attractive to our children – a community with substance and content, a community that stresses not only memory but other important values of our traditions – primarily social justice, equity, compassion and spirituality. We pride in its activities and achievements. We will have to find ways to convert alienation to action and passivity to pride, the pride of being possessors of a great legacy, a legacy which has meaning for today and beyond.”

We are the next generation to whom Abella addressed those words of challenge. More than a quarter century later, it still rests on our shoulders. Indeed, as he well knew, and which is why he likely cast it the way he did, the “challenge” falls upon every generation with appropriate adjustments according to the circumstances of the times and place.  

Readers of this weekly report know, GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy Ontario’s unfair, unjust educational funding. Queen’s Park justifies its educational funding policy on the basis of the 1996 decision by the Supreme Court in the Adler case in which the Court ruled Ontario could legally fund the educational system of only one religion to the exclusion of all religions practiced in Ontario. The decision did not prevent Ontario from extending funding to other, independent, denominational schools.

To this very day, some 26 years later, Ontario does not suggest that its policy is fair to non-Catholics. Rather, the government maintains it is immune from being legally compelled to change its policy. 

Between 1992 and 1995, Abella served as the president of the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC).

It was under Abella’s presidency that the Adler case was launched. Indeed it was the CJC that shepherded the case through the courts, providing counsel and resources on behalf of the plaintiffs. The Supreme Court decision was handed down in November of 1996 after being argued in January of that year. But it was an appeal  from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal in 1994 dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Ontario High Court in 1992.

Some years ago, Abella, an alumnus of Associated Hebrew Schools (AHS), lent his name and his photo to a campaign the school had embarked upon to help bust some very harmful myths about graduates of Jewish day schools. We are familiar with these myths: day school graduates tend not to participate in the life of the wider community; they adopt inward-looking ways and look only to a cloistered horizon. But the truth is generally quite the opposite. Abella’s life is the poignant refutation of the lie and/or the ignorance peddled by demagogues that public assistance to independent schools would shred to pieces the fabric of our multicultural society.

As Irving Abella’s life attests, day school graduates – dare we also say – independent school graduates – participate with as much vigour and volunteer energy in the life of the wider community as do public school graduates. They stand for inclusion, tolerance and wide horizons as forcefully as the graduates of public schools, indeed, if not more.

Irving Abella was the perfect representative/embodiment/spokesperson for Canadian Jewry: dignified of bearing; thoughtful, studied, careful, calmly compelling of speech, courageous in action and deeply good of character. Of some it would merely be an eye-rolling cliché to add, but of Abella it was as true as a ray of sharply defined light cutting through the dark, that he walked and talked and comported himself as comfortably and as purposefully with prime ministers and presidents as he did with hourly paid workers, salaried employees, students and editors. He was simply a deeply principled human being. His memory will always be for blessing.

Succeeding in having the courts re-assess the correctness of the Adler decision in the year 2022 and as a resykt, hopefully bring fairness to Ontario’s educational funding would be a fitting tribute to Irving Abella.

•••

Shabbat shalom Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

Posted in Uncategorized

Ending glaring injustice not on Ontario’s agenda

Last week, Premier Doug Ford unveiled his new cabinet to the people of Ontario.

He used weighty language in setting forth his governmental agenda. He called for Ontarians to be united and to work together. “With big challenges ahead, including an uncertain global economic climate, now is the time for unity and working together,” said Premier Ford. “Our government will be relentless in delivering on our ambitious plan to grow our economy and build infrastructure as we leave no stone unturned when it comes to solving the historic labour shortage. It’s all hands on deck.”

But the premier extended no hand of inclusion to the parents of the 150,000 children in independent schools who receive no funding whatsoever for the education of their children. The unity he urges for Ontarians obviously does not include us.

Ontario appears to have chosen to perpetuate an unconscionable policy of unequal justice in educational funding, to perpetuate what the late Keith Landy, then-chair of the Ontario region of the Canadian Jewish Congress, called some 25 years ago, a “glaring injustice” in refusing even to fund health support services for children in independent school as it does for children in public schools.

The premier wishes “to grow our economy and build infrastructure.” But he appears unaware that strengthening independent schools actually strengthens the entire educational enterprise of the province. A strengthened, thriving overall educational system, of course, is vital for a strong economy. This is not simply GAJE’s view. This is the conclusion of all of the other provinces, apart from the Atlantic provinces, who do provide some funding to independent schools. This is also the conclusion of most of the countries of Europe where the term “publicly funded schools” does include independent schools.

In addition, according to studies conducted by the Fraser Institute, extending some funding to independent schools improves overall educational outcomes and can actually lead to cost efficiencies for the overall provincial educational budget.

There are indeed significant substantive reasons to extend at least some public funding to independent schools. But the most profound reason for doing so is to remove the shame from Ontario for not rectifying the long lingering injustice and unfairness in the school funding.

How is it possible, let alone morally correct, that in the year 2022, Ontario should support and effectively prefer and help sustain one religion to the exclusion of other religions?

Ontario’s educational funding policy is not morally correct. To the contrary, it is morally flawed. It is long past time that this blatant discrimination should end. In the year 2022, Ontarians should not have to beg or plead with the government to act fairly and to end a glaring injustice.

Perhaps Stephen Lecce, renewed as the Minister of Education, will make the case to the premier?

•••

GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy the government’s unfair, unjust educational funding. If you wish to contribute to funding GAJE’s lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

•••

Shabbat shalom

Happy Canada Day

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

July 1, 2022

Ending glaring injustice not on Ontario’s agenda

Last week, Premier Doug Ford unveiled his new cabinet to the people of Ontario.

He used weighty language in setting forth his governmental agenda. He called for Ontarians to be united and to work together. “With big challenges ahead, including an uncertain global economic climate, now is the time for unity and working together,” said Premier Ford. “Our government will be relentless in delivering on our ambitious plan to grow our economy and build infrastructure as we leave no stone unturned when it comes to solving the historic labour shortage. It’s all hands on deck.”

But the premier extended no hand of inclusion to the parents of the 150,000 children in independent schools who receive no funding whatsoever for the education of their children. The unity he urges for Ontarians obviously does not include us.

Ontario appears to have chosen to perpetuate an unconscionable policy of unequal justice in educational funding, to perpetuate what the late Keith Landy, then-chair of the Ontario region of the Canadian Jewish Congress, called some 25 years ago, a “glaring injustice” in refusing even to fund health support services for children in independent school as it does for children in public schools.

The premier wishes “to grow our economy and build infrastructure.” But he appears unaware that strengthening independent schools actually strengthens the entire educational enterprise of the province. A strengthened, thriving overall educational system, of course, is vital for a strong economy. This is not simply GAJE’s view. This is the conclusion of all of the other provinces, apart from the Atlantic provinces, who do provide some funding to independent schools. This is also the conclusion of most of the countries of Europe where the term “publicly funded schools” does include independent schools.

In addition, according to studies conducted by the Fraser Institute, extending some funding to independent schools improves overall educational outcomes and can actually lead to cost efficiencies for the overall provincial educational budget.

There are indeed significant substantive reasons to extend at least some public funding to independent schools. But the most profound reason for doing so is to remove the shame from Ontario for not rectifying the long lingering injustice and unfairness in the school funding.

How is it possible, let alone morally correct, that in the year 2022, Ontario should support and effectively prefer and help sustain one religion to the exclusion of other religions?

Ontario’s educational funding policy is not morally correct. To the contrary, it is morally flawed. It is long past time that this blatant discrimination should end. In the year 2022, Ontarians should not have to beg or plead with the government to act fairly and to end a glaring injustice.

Perhaps Stephen Lecce, renewed as the Minister of Education, will make the case to the premier?

•••

GAJE has launched an application in court to remedy the government’s unfair, unjust educational funding. If you wish to contribute to funding GAJE’s lawsuit, please click here.

For further information, please contact Israel Mida at: imida1818@gmail.com

Charitable receipts for donations for income tax purposes will be issued by Mizrachi Canada. Your donations will be used for the sole purpose of underwriting the costs of the lawsuit.

•••

Shabbat shalom

Happy Canada Day

Grassroots for Affordable Jewish Education (GAJE)

July 1, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized
Like Us on Facebook!
Parents Tell Their Stories

We would like to share personal stories about how the affordability issue has affected families in our community. We will post these stories anonymously on our Facebook page and on our website.

We will not include any personal information such as names, schools, other institutions, or any other identifying information. We reserve the right to edit all submissions.

To share your story, either send us a message on our Facebook page or email us @ info @ gaje.ca.

%d bloggers like this: